Berkeley Engineering

Spring 2002

Contents

From the dean

Features

News Briefs

>

Prominent scientist heads new research center

>
>

Microchip seeks out prostate cancer

> Technology venture helps Merced students
> Will printed circuits replace barcodes on tomorrow's
soup cans?
>
> Revisiting shaken-baby syndrome
>

Student Gazette

Faculty Highlights

Alumni Affairs

College Support

Archives
Download
Fall 2001 PDF



Testing, testing: new dorms' seismic foundation system passes muster

By Jessica M. Scully

Berkeley architects, engineers, and administrators teamed up last fall to test the seismic strength of foundation piers at a campus construction site. Using an innovative dynamic testing device, above, engineers collected and analyzed data that will lead to more effective retrofitting and lower construction costs. Nick Sitar photo

A series of seismic tests on drilled piers, conducted in a campus parking lot, could help existing Berkeley structures ride out quakes more effectively while cutting costs for constructing earthquake-safe buildings in the future.

The Berkeley Seismic Review Committee (SRC) launched the project last fall as part of its continuing effort to lower the cost and improve the effectiveness of seismic design on the Berkeley campus.

Funded by Berkeley's Capital Projects, the office that oversees campus construction, with participation by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center (PEER), the tests assessed the performance of drilled cast-in-place piers, not in a lab, but at an actual campus construction site.

"While drilled cast-in-place piers are a long-established part of constructing earthquake-safe building foundations," says Michael Ordonia, project manager with Capital Projects, "the twist here is that rather than relying on scientific guesses as to the capacity of the piers, these piers were actually tested in situ to measure their ultimate capacity."

Supervised by structural engineering firm Rutherford and Chekene, the tests took place at the Underhill Parking Lot on Bowditch and College, adjacent to dormitory Units 1 and 2. The team used the parking lot, nestled between the highrise dorms where over the next four years additional construction will take place, to test new technology that could be put to use quickly, and right next door.

Site engineers divided the parking lot into two test areas, drilling three holes into the ground at each test area, then pouring in concrete, which cured for two weeks. Then they ran a series of static and dynamic tests on the piers.

The static tests measured the steady force the piers could withstand by pulling them out of the ground over a few hours; the dynamic tests were performed using a relatively new dynamic test device, a Fundex Pile Load Test (PLT), recently introduced in California by American Piledriving Inc. This device mimics axial seismic loading by dropping a heavy weight onto a pier for a duration of about 0.1 seconds. Test results came as a pleasant surprise, according to PEER director Jack Moehle. "The piers were three times stronger than was previously thought," he says.

Foundation piers transfer the force of an earthquake from a building to the soil, and do this at significant depths. But determining the size and quantity of piers necessary to safely accomplish this transfer depends on the unique properties of the soil on which a building is constructed.

Unlike pre-made piers, whose strength can be evaluated each time they are driven into the ground, direct tests of cast-in-place piers are rare because of the way they are constructed. "That means," says Moehle, "that you don't have any direct measure of the strength or capacity of the cast-in-place piers." To compensate for this, traditional design formulas are conservative, which often results in using more and larger diameter piers than are necessary.

"The dynamic nature of the PLT tests will allow us to use better values for seismic design of foundation elements on the Berkeley campus and, hopefully, we can also influence future design to take better advantage of the good dynamic response of foundation elements," says civil engineering professor Nick Sitar, outgoing SRC chair. "Also, the PLT test is relatively simple and quick, which means we should be able to use it on a more routine basis on future projects."

The project will create significant savings for the University, Ordonia says. Capital Projects staff estimate that after spending roughly $100,000 to conduct the tests, the campus will garner a net savings of up to $400,000 in reduced construction costs. Test results have already been incorporated into the residential hall building project adjacent to the test site. And because the soils under the campus are fairly uniform, the research could be used for upcoming construction projects as well, says Ordonia.

Test data will also help retrofit existing buildings. "If there's some structural element that has to be rebuilt as part of the building, now we have an additional tool with which to analyze the structural system," says Ordonia. "What's more, the project offered a unique opportunity for architects, structural engineers, geotechnical engineers, earthquake engineers, and University administrators to work together using performance-based engineering techniques."


FOREFRONT reports on activities in the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. It features developments of interest to the engineering and scientific communities and to alumni and friends of the College.

Published three times a year by the Engineering Public Affairs Office. Have a comment about Forefront? E-mail your letter to the editor. Click here to learn more about the magazine.


© UC Regents    Feedback