By Rachel Shafer
|
Photos By Courtesy UC Berkeley
To build or not to build?
As of press time, the fate of UC Berkeley’s planned
student-athlete training center rests in the hands of Alameda Superior Court
Judge Barbara Miller, who has 90 days from October 11 to decide whether the
University can proceed with construction of the facility.
During the fall trial, lawyers argued over several issues,
including the center’s seismic safety.
Two Berkeley Engineering professors proffered their own
opinion on the matter earlier this year. After reviewing an independent study
that found no active faults under the building site, civil and environmental
engineering professors Greg Fenves, past department chair, and Jack Moehle,
director of the Pacific
Earthquake Engineering
Research Center,
argued in a San Francisco Chronicle
op-ed that the project must go forward.
“Cal
athletes and athletic staff deserve the same level of protection as occupants
of other seismically upgraded campus buildings,” the researchers wrote. “Let
them move out of Memorial Stadium and into a state-of-the-art building that
meets meticulous earthquake safety standards.”
Construction on the center has been stalled since last
January when Judge Miller issued an injunction in response to three lawsuits
brought against the University.
Fenves and Moehle cited the independent study as evidence
that the project is compliant with seismic law. Although the center would be
close to the Hayward
fault, it would experience no greater shaking than any other building within a
two-mile radius, they argued, and its superb, peer-reviewed design assures
seismic soundness.
“The city’s allegation is unfounded from our perspective as
earthquake engineers,” Fenves and Moehle concluded. “In fact, the city’s
lawsuit has the potential to jeopardize the safety of Cal athletes by delaying and possibly
derailing the first step of a critical project to seismically retrofit the
83-year-old Memorial Stadium.”
If Judge Miller rules in favor of the University, work on
the project will begin immediately. If she rules against, the University says
it’s ready to respond to any additional legal requirements she imposes.