Clean-up efforts following the November San Francisco Bay oil spill might have been more effective if they had focused on the entire depth of the bay instead of just the surface, says Berkeley environmental engineer Mark Stacey. “Some portion of the oil sinks and moves around with the water,” he explains. “It’s a 30-story building down there.”
Photo credit: AP images/Eric Risberg
Last
November 7, the 900-foot Cosco Busan container ship slammed into the San
Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, spewing nearly 60,000 gallons of bunker fuel into
the bay.
As
spills go, it was comparatively small. (The Exxon-Valdez spill was 200 times
larger.) But oil tarred the shoreline from Point Reyes
to Half Moon Bay, closing the beaches, stalling the commercial crab fishing
season and killing an estimated 20,000 marine birds. Toxins from the oil will
remain suspended in the bay for some time, says oceanographer and integrative
biology professor Thomas “Zack” Powell, one of Mark Stacey’s colleagues on the
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project. Plant and animal plankton absorb these
toxins, which are in turn absorbed in even greater concentrations by the fish
who feed on them. Birds have a higher risk of short-term death because, in
preening, they ingest the oil.
“We
have to attempt to clean them up, but I’m afraid it’s more of a palliative for
us than it is for the birds,” Powell says. “And, where oil has washed up on
shore, cleanup efforts are often worse than the oil because they use steam
cleaning, which kills all the organisms.”
There
were widespread complaints that containment and cleanup efforts were slow and
ineffectual. But Mark Stacey believes that emergency officials did the best
they could given the limited information they had.
“All
eyes were focused on the movement of the oil slick on the surface of the bay,”
he says. “There was no information about what was happening below the surface,
but much of the oil had quickly moved down into the water, where it was subject
to transport.” Furthermore, the central bay has a complex geometry, Stacey
says, broken up by bridges, islands, a sill and shallow shoals, not to mention
ship traffic.
“If
we want to do predictive modeling on a timescale of a few hours, such as in the
event of an oil spill, we need to know the underlying physics of the bay and
have real-time data,” he adds. “It’s more important to know where a spill is
going than where it is.”
To
that end, Stacey is working with San
Francisco State University geosciences professor Toby
Garfield and UC Davis oceanographer John Largier to devise a system of
breadbox-sized sensors that would sit at the bottom of the bay to monitor flow
dynamics over the entire depth, then wirelessly transmit their data back to
shore in real time.
The
researchers are seeking funding and local partners to launch the project in
earnest. With just a handful of such devices, Stacey says, engineers could
uncover the mysteries of the bay’s dynamics. If they succeed, the data
streaming from their devices may someday give responders a head start in
dealing with the next oil spill that threatens the region.